|
1
|
|
|
2
|
- Senior Transportation Planning Study
- Laraine Vance, DOT Planning Division Manager
- Roadway / Infrastructure
- Bob Galante, DOT Engineering Division Manager
- Public Transit
- Rebecca Gutowsky, CCT Transit Division Manager
- Cobb Senior Services Transportation Program
- Pam Breeden, Director, Cobb Senior Services
- Questions & Answers
|
|
3
|
|
|
4
|
- Began – Fall 2006
- Ended – Summer 2007
- Conducted by – Wilbur Smith Associates
- Managed by Cobb DOT Planning Division
in coordination with Cobb Senior Services (CSS) and Cobb
Community Transit (CCT)
|
|
5
|
- Identify innovative ways to
improve accessibility and mobility for older adults living in
Cobb County
- “by improving coordination among agencies so that services are
effectively targeted and resources effectively leveraged”
|
|
6
|
- Improve accessibility/ mobility for older adults in Cobb County
|
|
7
|
- Public Surveys
- Public Workshops
- Stakeholder Committee
- Information Dissemination
- Interviews with Community Leaders
|
|
8
|
- Geography
- Needs and opportunities vary by geography
- Both CSS and CCT service have geographic limitations
- Connectivity
- Limited connectivity between modes
- Only 5 of 8 Senior Facilities have access to services
- Constraints / Barriers
- Limited service in evening, late night and weekend periods
- Funding, Regulatory, Institutional
- CCT Paratransit only operates within the ADA requirements
- Access to fixed routes operated by CCT is limited
- Lack of Information
- Information dissemination
- Community outreach
- Community education
|
|
9
|
- Increase options for services
- Enhance and expand various modes
- Improve connectivity to fixed route, including MARTA
- Identify solutions based on a “family of services” approach, tailored to
geographic needs of the County
- Incorporate volunteer solutions
- Increase Community Access to Services
- Broaden and improve external communication
|
|
10
|
- Improved Mobility
- Seniors
- Non-seniors
- “Universal Access” for everyone
- Expanded Coordination / Partnerships
- Increase funding base
- Effective use of existing resources
- Identify other opportunities
|
|
11
|
- Three tiered approach
- Incremental program development and implementation over time
|
|
12
|
|
|
13
|
- Establish Infrastructure
- Establish a Mobility Action Council
- Hire Dedicated Mobility Staff
- Develop Formal Agreements between CCT & CSS
- Initiate service-related improvements
- Joint marketing
- Shared driver training
- Shared travel training
|
|
14
|
- Intermediate Coordination Steps
- Expand Partnerships
- Create partnership with AARP
- Explore opportunities for vehicle sharing
- Expand MOU to partners / local vendors
- Initiate discussions with business community
- Expand Services
- Develop County-wide Volunteer Transportation Program
- Expand local taxi Voucher Program
- Coordinate with MARTA
- Develop flexible route service plan
- Coordinate with CSS to create transportation hubs at Centers
|
|
15
|
|
|
16
|
- Long Range Coordination Steps
- Increase Coordination / Expand Services
- Formalize contractual coordination arrangements
- Volunteer transportation program
- Travel training program
- New CCT service with deviated or demand-response operation
- Continue formalized marketing and Community Education programs
- Explore Other Mobility Options
- Carpools / vanpools
- Parking coordination
|
|
17
|
- Maintain/re-evaluate existing funds
- Public Transportation
- Human Service
- Local funds
- Maximize federal funding opportunities
- Build partnerships
- Public Sector
- Private Sector
|
|
18
|
|
|
19
|
- July 17, 2007 – Study findings presented to Cobb County Board of
Commissioners (BOC)
- July 31, 2007 - Study was accepted by the BOC
- August 14, 2007 – BOC approved Tier 1 funding
|
|
20
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
22
|
- Design Features
- Traffic Operations
- Pedestrian Access / Signalization
- Safety Issues
|
|
23
|
- Improve lighting at intersections
- Reduce intersection skew angle
- Offset left turn lanes
|
|
24
|
- Reduce sign clutter
- Advance warning signs / street name signs
- Increase letter height
- Improve roadway delineation
- Traffic control at work zones
|
|
25
|
- Accommodate Pedestrian Walk Times
- Provide Countdown Signal Head
- Light Emitting Diodes (LED)
|
|
26
|
- Monitor crash data for older driver trends
- Identify specific locations for potential improvements
|
|
27
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
29
|
- Operates within a ¾ mile boundary of fixed route service.
- Provides curb-to-curb service.
- Available to individuals who, due to the nature of their disability
cannot access the fixed route system.
|
|
30
|
- Individuals must be certified to participate in the program
- Must call a day ahead to schedule a trip
- Fare is twice the fixed route fare - $3.00 per one way trip
|
|
31
|
|
|
32
|
- Reduced Fares for Seniors and Disabled on All Local Routes
|
|
33
|
- Low Floor Buses that kneel
- Easy to Board
- Wheelchair Ramp vs. Wheelchair Lift
|
|
34
|
- CCT Buses “Talk” so if you are visually impaired you will know where you
are at and when to get off the bus
|
|
35
|
|
|
36
|
- Travel Training
- Independence is the Key
- We can teach you how to ride CCT
|
|
37
|
- Get on the Bus, Gus began Sept.
2006
- The program educates active Cobb County senior adults on how to use
alternative modes of transportation
|
|
38
|
- Get on the Bus, Gus – we can all make a difference and have fun, too!
|
|
39
|
|
|
40
|
- Transportation is the number one obstacle for seniors in Cobb and the
region. The 2005 White House
Conference on Aging concluded that older Americans must have
transportation options to retain their independence.
- The lack of available transportation causes a severe hardship for
seniors who cannot get to essential services such as medical treatment.
|
|
41
|
|
|
42
|
- The inability to move around in the community increases seniors’
isolation from the mainstream of life.
- 19.1% of all seniors 65+ in Cobb County have mobility and/or self-care
limitations.
- Cobb Senior Services cannot meet demand due to increased transportation
costs and diminished funding.
- The senior population in Cobb is expected to increase by 127% in the
next 22 years.
|
|
43
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
45
|
- Expand the Voucher Program for those clients seeking evening/weekend
travel and out of County destinations.
- Explore expanding the voucher program to include all demand response
clients.
- Initiate a collaboration to advocate for more affordable private sector
transportation opportunities.
- Advocate for faith based initiatives in transportation.
- Partner with DOT to explore the Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient
Transportation Equity Act: A Legacy for Users (SAFETEA-LU).
|
|
46
|
- Currently Demand Response routes are designed around client’s requests
for doctor appointments, which can be on any day or time. The majority of the trips therefore
are one passenger. This system
may be customer service oriented, but is fiscally inefficient and results in fewer passenger
transports.
- Cobb will be divided in quadrants called zones. Each zone will be assigned specific
days and clients will be able to request pick-ups by their home
locations.
- Fridays will be set aside for trips that are important, but do not fit
into the Zone concept
- This transition will require education for both the clients and their
doctors. CSS will create a flyer,
which will be mailed to each client and their doctor’s scheduling
clerks. The Zone routes will be
up and running by late January 2008.
We will monitor expenditure improvements and adjust for
variables.
|
|
47
|
- Social Services Block Grant- 2006
- Demand response trips for seniors 60+
- New Freedom Grant-2008
- Demand response trips for the 60+ disabled
|
|
48
|
- DOT
- ARC
- Community Services Board
- Faith Based Community
- Private Sector
|
|
49
|
|
|
50
|
|